ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so what separates them is cost and not speed.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400 | 6400 |
| 32 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | £515.67at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 | £461.55betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | £16.11 | £14.42better |
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 6400 MT/s at CL32 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 6400 MT/s, which is 51200 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL32. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.
Price and tracked history
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at £515.67, or £16.11 per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at £461.55, or £14.42. At the same 32GB, that puts TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 £54.12 less than ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB's £515.67 sits 14% under its own 90-day median. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32's £461.55 sits 6% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 costs less than ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and those two land in the same place.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32, tracked at £461.55 against £515.67: £54.12 between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 costs less than ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.