ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38

ADATAXPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB32 GB · 6000 MT/s · 30 CL · 10.00 ns
PatriotViper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL3832 GB · 8200 MT/s · 38 CL · 9.27 nsLeads on Speed
In short

9.27 ns of true latency for Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 against 10.00 ns for ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. On top of the latency, Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 carries the lower tracked price, so both measured axes point the same way.

SpecificationADATAXPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GBPatriotViper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)60008200better
3038
True latency (ns)10.009.27better
Current best price£505.36at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13£399.99betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13
Price per GB£15.79£12.50better

ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 in detail

True latency

Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is the lower-latency kit at 9.27 ns, against 10.00 ns for ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.73 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30; Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 runs 8200 MT/s at CL38.

Transfer rate

Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is rated 8200 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 65600 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Price and tracked history

ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is tracked at £505.36 — £15.79 per gigabyte — and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 at £399.99, or £12.50. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is £105.37 less than ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. At £505.36, ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is running 14% below its own 90-day median. At £399.99, Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is running 20% below its own 90-day median.

Kit layout

ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Lighting and timings

On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 30-40-40, and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 does not publish one.

Which to buy

Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 gives up nothing to ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB on what is measured here: quicker on true latency at 9.27 ns against 10.00 ns, and the cheaper of the two at the prices this site has tracked.

Common questions about this pair

Is ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38?
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is, on true latency: 9.27 ns against 10.00 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30 and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 runs 8200 MT/s at CL38; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which one costs less?
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38, at £399.99 against £505.36 — £105.37 apart at the same 32GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 gives up nothing to ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB on what is measured here: quicker on true latency at 9.27 ns against 10.00 ns, and the cheaper of the two at the prices this site has tracked.
How we track prices

Related comparisons