Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
9.33 ns of true latency for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 9.70 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairDominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6600better | 6000 |
| 32 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.70 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | — | £425.95at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-12 |
| Price per GB | — | £13.31 |
No tracked price for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 9.70 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB, 0.36 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB runs 6600 MT/s at CL32; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 6600 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 52800 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB is 32-39-39-76, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is 28-36-36-76. On error correction: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 9.70 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x16GB runs 6600 MT/s at CL32 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.