Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
9.33 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 9.38 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 30 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.38 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | — | £602.42at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | £18.83 |
No tracked price for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 9.38 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 — a difference of 0.04 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 runs 6400 MT/s at CL30; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 runs 32-40-40-84, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 does not publish one.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the quicker at 9.33 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 9.38 ns. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL30 runs 6400 MT/s at CL30 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the quicker at 9.33 ns of true latency.