Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 13.33 ns for Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CrucialBallistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 2400 | 3200better |
| 16 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 13.33 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | — | £231.85at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-11 |
| Price per GB | — | £7.25 |
No tracked price for Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 13.33 ns for Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 — a difference of 3.33 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 runs 2400 MT/s at CL16; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is rated 3200 MT/s against 2400 MT/s for Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 — 25600 MB/s per module, against 19200 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time. Both kits are published at CL16, so the same count of cycles takes less time at the higher clock, and the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 ships as 4 × 8GB, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.
Lighting
On the lighting question: Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 13.33 ns. Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 4x8GB 2400 CL16 runs 2400 MT/s at CL16 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.