Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 vs G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 arrive at the same true latency, 16.67 ns apiece. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | CrucialDDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 | G.SkillRipjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4800 | 4800 |
| 40 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.67 | 16.67 |
| Current best price | — | £810.02at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | £12.66 |
No tracked price for Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 vs G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 16.67 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 4800 MT/s at CL40 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 4800 MT/s, which is 38400 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL40. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.
Kit layout
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 ships as 2 × 32GB and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 is published with no RGB lighting, and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 publishes none, and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 is 40-39-39-76.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 16.67 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 faster than G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40?
- Neither is. Both work out at 16.67 ns of true latency — Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 runs 4800 MT/s at CL40, G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 runs 4800 MT/s at CL40, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 16.67 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.