G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. Neither is quicker than the other; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is simply tracked at the lower price, and that is the whole of it.
| Specification | G.SKILLFlare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 30 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | £549.99at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 | £461.55betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | £17.19 | £14.42better |
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns by different routes: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 6000 MT/s at CL30, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at 6400 MT/s at CL32. A CAS number counts cycles rather than time, so a higher clock absorbs a looser one and the two arrive together — which is why these spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Price and tracked history
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB is tracked at £549.99 — £17.19 per gigabyte — and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at £461.55, or £14.42. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is £88.44 less than G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB. At £461.55, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is running 6% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 30-38-38-96, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 32-39-39-102. On error correction: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with no ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 supports it. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 costs less than G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- Neither. Both come out at 10.00 ns of true latency: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and the two reconcile to one figure.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32, at £461.55 against £549.99 — £88.44 apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 costs less than G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.