G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. The latency is level, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the one tracked at the lower price, so cost is the only difference.
| Specification | G.SKILLRipjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 30 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | £667.04at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-09 | £461.55betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | £20.85 | £14.42better |
G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB gets there at 6000 MT/s at CL30, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at 6400 MT/s at CL32. CAS latency counts clock cycles rather than time, so a higher clock paired with a looser CAS number arrives at the same place — which is why these two spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB is tracked at £667.04, or £20.85 per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at £461.55, or £14.42. At the same 32GB, that puts TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 £205.49 less than G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32's £461.55 sits 6% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 30-40-40-96, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 costs less than G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and those two land in the same place.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32, tracked at £461.55 against £667.04: £205.49 between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 costs less than G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 2x16GB at the prices tracked here, and the two are identical on true latency at 10.00 ns. It is the cheaper kit, not the faster one — nothing here suggests it will feel quicker.