Skip to main content

G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16

G.SKILLRipjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB32 GB · 3600 MT/s · 16 CL · 8.89 ns
G.SkillTrident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL1632 GB · 3600 MT/s · 16 CL · 8.89 ns
In short

G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB and G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 arrive at the same true latency, 8.89 ns apiece. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.

SpecificationG.SKILLRipjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GBG.SkillTrident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)36003600
1616
True latency (ns)8.898.89
Current best price£259.26at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13
Price per GB£8.10

No tracked price for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.

G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 in detail

True latency

Both kits land on 8.89 ns. The two spec sheets state the same clock and the same CAS grade — 3600 MT/s at CL16 either way — and true latency is those two figures reconciled, so it comes out the same for each.

Transfer rate

Both kits are rated 3600 MT/s — 28800 MB/s per module — and both are published at CL16. The true latency above is computed from exactly those two figures, so it lands in the same place for each.

Kit layout

G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Lighting and timings

On the lighting question: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 16-19-19-39, and G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 does not publish one.

Which to buy

At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 8.89 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.

Common questions about this pair

Is G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16?
Neither. Both come out at 8.89 ns of true latency: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16 and G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 runs 3600 MT/s at CL16, and the two reconcile to one figure.
Which of these two should I buy?
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 8.89 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.
How we track prices

Related comparisons