Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB vs PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB
14.29 ns of true latency for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB against 16.43 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB | PHS-memoryDDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 5600 |
| 40 | 46 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.29better | 16.43 |
| Current best price | £468.25at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | £14.63 | — |
No tracked price for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB vs PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 14.29 ns against 16.43 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB, 2.14 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 5600 MT/s, or 44800 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Kit layout
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB ships as 2 × 16GB, PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB ships as 1 × 32GB. A real difference, and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for adding later. Which suits comes down to the board and to whether more memory is planned.
Voltage
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is specified at 1.25 V and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB at 1.1 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is 40-40-40, and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB publishes none. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB has it, and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB supports ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB faster than PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 14.29 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB against 16.43 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40 and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 ECC UDIMM 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 1x32GB is the quicker at 14.29 ns of true latency.