KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB
9.33 ns of true latency for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 9.50 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is tracked at the lower price as well, so it leads on both axes this page measures.
| Specification | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 8000better |
| 28 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.33better | 9.50 |
| Current best price | £425.95betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-12 | £541.63at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | £13.31better | £16.93 |
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 9.50 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.17 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is rated 8000 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 64000 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Price and tracked history
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is tracked at £425.95 — £13.31 per gigabyte — and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB at £541.63, or £16.93. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is £115.68 less than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB. At £541.63, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is running 4% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 28-36-36-76, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 leads TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.
Common questions about this pair
- Is KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which one costs less?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28, at £425.95 against £541.63 — £115.68 apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 leads TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.