TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 comes out ahead: 9.33 ns, where TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB takes 9.44 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so each kit leads on one axis and neither leads on both.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 7200better |
| 28 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.33better | 9.44 |
| Current best price | £602.42at Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 | £486.00betterat Amazon.co.uk · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | £18.83 | £15.19better |
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 9.44 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB — a difference of 0.11 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is rated 7200 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 57600 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Price and tracked history
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is tracked at £602.42 — £18.83 per gigabyte — and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at £486.00, or £15.19. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is £116.42 less than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28. At £602.42, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is running 0% below its own 90-day median. At £486.00, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is running 4% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting
On the lighting question: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting.
Which to buy
The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB; the lower true latency to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28, 9.33 ns against 9.44 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 9.44 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB, at £486.00 against £602.42 — £116.42 apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB; the lower true latency to TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28, 9.33 ns against 9.44 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.