Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory Spec and Price in Italy
This DDR5-5600 kit is the slowest and lowest-voltage DDR5 option among Crucial's kits, running at just 1.1V with CAS 46 timings, notably more conservative than the tuned profiles Crucial reserves for its Pro line. 32GB across two UDIMM modules makes it a straightforward capacity upgrade for a DDR5 desktop that won't be pushed past stock speeds. Everyday computing and general productivity builds are the natural fit, not gaming rigs chasing bandwidth.
Tied 73rd of 139 models in the RAM catalog on Speed — 16 models share this figure.
No tracked price — this page compares specifications alone.
Specifications
- Capacity
- 2x16GB
- True latency
- 16.43 ns
- Memory type
- DDR5
- Speed
- 5600 MT/s
- CAS latency
- Form factor
- UDIMM
- Voltage
- 1.1 V
- Timings
- 46-45-45
- Modules
- 2
- RGB
- No
Capacities
| Configuration | Part number | Speed | CAS latency | True latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1x16GB | CT16G56C46U5 | — | — | — |
| 2x8GB | CT2K8G56C46U5 | — | — | — |
| 2x16GB | CT2K16G56C46U5 | 5600 MT/s | 46 | 16.43 ns |
| 1x16GB 4800 CL40 | CT16G48C40U5 | 4800 MT/s | 40 | 16.67 ns |
| 2x16GB 4800 CL40 | CT2K16G48C40U5 | 4800 MT/s | 40 | 16.67 ns |
| 1x32GB | CT32G56C46U5 | 5600 MT/s | 46 | 16.43 ns |
| 2x32GB | CT2K32G56C46U5 | — | — | — |
| 1x64GB | CT64G56C46U5 | — | — | — |
| 2x32GB 4800 CL40 | CT2K32G48C40U5 | 4800 MT/s | 40 | 16.67 ns |
Guides for this category
What owners and reviewers say
Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices
Commonly praised
- Reliable and inexpensive, with respectable performance at standard voltage and low operating temperatures.
- Low-profile, heatsink-free modules fit any motherboard, backed by a lifetime warranty.
Commonly criticised
- Not the fastest speed available, and no heatsinks or lighting for buyers who want them.
Sources behind this summary
Sources
Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.