ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 13.33 ns for Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | GigastoneGame Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 13.33 |
| Current best price | $699.00at Newegg · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | $21.84 | — |
No tracked price for Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 13.33 ns for Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB — a difference of 3.33 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL40.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 1.3 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-39-39, and Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 40-40-40-76.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the quicker at 10.00 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 13.33 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL40; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the quicker at 10.00 ns of true latency.