ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | Silicon PowerValue Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 36 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 12.00 |
| Current best price | $699.00at Newegg · captured 2026-09-15 | — |
| Price per GB | $21.84 | — |
No tracked price for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 in detail
True latency
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 — a difference of 2.00 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-39-39, and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 30-38-38-96.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36?
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.