Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 vs G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 arrive at the same true latency, 16.67 ns apiece. Neither is quicker than the other; G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 is simply tracked at the lower price, and that is the whole of it.
| Specification | CrucialDDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 | G.SkillRipjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4800 | 4800 |
| 40 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.67 | 16.67 |
| Current best price | $989.99at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-13 | $895.00betterat Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-04 |
| Price per GB | $15.47 | $13.98better |
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 vs G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 16.67 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 4800 MT/s at CL40 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 4800 MT/s, which is 38400 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL40. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.
Price and tracked history
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 is tracked at $989.99, or $15.47 per gigabyte; G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 at $895.00, or $13.98. At the same 64GB, that puts G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 $94.99 less than Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40.
Kit layout
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 ships as 2 × 32GB and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 is published with no RGB lighting, and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 publishes none, and G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 is 40-39-39-76.
Which to buy
At the prices tracked here G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 undercuts Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40, and the two are level on true latency at 16.67 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 faster than G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40?
- Neither is. Both work out at 16.67 ns of true latency — Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40 runs 4800 MT/s at CL40, G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 runs 4800 MT/s at CL40, and those two land in the same place.
- Which one costs less?
- G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40, tracked at $895.00 against $989.99: $94.99 between them at the same 64GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At the prices tracked here G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 2x32GB CL40 undercuts Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x32GB 4800 CL40, and the two are level on true latency at 16.67 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.