Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is tracked at the lower price as well, so it leads on both axes this page measures.
| Specification | CrucialPro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 36 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 12.00 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | $505.00at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-13 | $415.99betterat Newegg · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | $15.78 | $13.00better |
Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB — a difference of 2.00 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Price and tracked history
Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB is tracked at $505.00 — $15.78 per gigabyte — and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at $415.99, or $13.00. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is $89.01 less than Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB. At $505.00, Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB is running 0% below its own 90-day median. At $415.99, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is running 27% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB runs 36-38-38-80, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 gives up nothing to Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB on what is measured here: quicker on true latency at 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns, and the cheaper of the two at the prices this site has tracked.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL36 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32, at $415.99 against $505.00 — $89.01 apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 gives up nothing to Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB on what is measured here: quicker on true latency at 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns, and the cheaper of the two at the prices this site has tracked.