G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB and Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 8.89 ns apiece. G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so what separates them is cost and not speed.
| Specification | G.SKILLRipjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB | KingstonFURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600 | 3600 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.89 | 8.89 |
| Current best price | $209.99betterat Newegg · captured 2026-09-04 | $420.99at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-09 |
| Price per GB | $6.56better | $13.16 |
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 8.89 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 3600 MT/s at CL16 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3600 MT/s, which is 28800 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL16. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.
Price and tracked history
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is tracked at $209.99, or $6.56 per gigabyte; Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB at $420.99, or $13.16. At the same 32GB, that puts G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB $211.00 less than Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB. $209.99 is the lowest this site has ever recorded for G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB. Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB's $420.99 sits 16% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is 16-19-19-39, and Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB is 16-20-20. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB has it, and Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
At the prices tracked here G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB undercuts Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB, and the two are level on true latency at 8.89 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB?
- Neither is. Both work out at 8.89 ns of true latency — G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16, Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16, and those two land in the same place.
- Which one costs less?
- G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB, tracked at $209.99 against $420.99: $211.00 between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At the prices tracked here G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB undercuts Kingston FURY Renegade DDR4-3600 2x16GB, and the two are level on true latency at 8.89 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.