TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB
10.00 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB is the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so each kit leads on one axis and neither leads on both.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB | TimetecPremium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3200 |
| 16 | 22 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 13.75 |
| Current best price | $205.99at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-04 | $196.99betterat Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | $6.44 | $6.16better |
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB, 3.75 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3200 MT/s, or 25600 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Price and tracked history
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is tracked at $205.99, or $6.44 per gigabyte; Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB at $196.99, or $6.16. At the same 32GB, that puts Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB $9.00 less than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB's $205.99 sits 14% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB at 1.2 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and ECC
On lighting: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB the quicker on true latency at 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB, tracked at $196.99 against $205.99: $9.00 between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB the quicker on true latency at 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.