Skip to main content
Toshiba

Toshiba N300 HDD Spec and Price in Brazil

SATA8TB7200 RPM

Toshiba's N300 is the NAS line of the company's internal drives: 7200rpm, up to a 512MB cache, a 180TB/year workload rating, and a three-year warranty, per the Toshiba data sheet. The N300 is CMR with a stable-speed design aimed at multi-drive home and small-office NAS builds, typically priced a step below the WD Red Plus and IronWolf at the same capacity. The line runs from 4TB to 22TB.

Current best price
R$ 1.586,75Price too old to confirm

Prices include taxes.

The last tracked price for the 12TB Toshiba N300 HDD in Brazil was R$ 1.586,75 at Amazon.com.br, captured 2026-10-07. Across one tracked merchant and 10 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 12TB Toshiba N300 HDD is R$ 4.275,00 and the lowest recorded price is R$ 1.586,75. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

  • 12TB
September 17, 202610 data pointstoday · R$ 4.061,25

Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
8TB
Interface
SATA
Sequential read
281 MB/s
Sequential write
281 MB/s
Rotation speed
7200 RPM
Form factor
3.5-inch
Cache
512 MB
Warranty
3 years

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberRotation speedCacheCurrent best price
4TBHDWG4407200 RPM256 MB—
8TBHDWG4807200 RPM512 MB—
12TBHDWG21C7200 RPM256 MB

R$ 1.586,75

Price too old to confirm

16TBHDWG31G7200 RPM512 MB—

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Strong write performance compared with the drives it was tested against.
  • Reliability-focused design rated for heavy annual workloads and suited to always-on multi-bay use.

Commonly criticised

  • At review time the line topped out below the higher-capacity competing model.

Sources behind this summary

Guides for this category

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.