TeamGroup CX2 Spec and Price in Brazil
At SATA speeds — 540/490 MB/s sequential — the CX2 belongs to an older, cheaper tier than the two NVMe TeamGroup drives here, aimed at users replacing a hard drive or upgrading an older laptop rather than chasing NVMe bandwidth. TLC NAND without DRAM cache and a 200TB endurance rating over a 3-year warranty, the shortest of the TeamGroup trio, reflect its entry-level positioning. It fits systems limited to SATA connectivity or budget builds where capacity and boot-time gains over spinning storage matter more than throughput.
Tied 101st of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential read — 3 models share this figure. 103rd of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential write.
No tracked price — this page compares specifications alone.
Specifications
- Capacity
- 1TB
- Interface
- SATA
- Sequential read
- 540 MB/s
- Sequential write
- 490 MB/s
- Form factor
- 2.5-inch
- NAND type
- TLC
- DRAM cache
- Endurance (TBW)
- 200 TB
- Warranty
- 3 years
Capacities
| Configuration | Part number | Endurance (TBW) | Sequential write | Sequential read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 256GB | T253X6256G0C101 | 80 TB | 430 MB/s | 520 MB/s |
| 512GB | T253X6512G0C101 | 120 TB | 470 MB/s | 530 MB/s |
| 1TB | T253X6001T0C101 | 200 TB | 490 MB/s | 540 MB/s |
| 2TB | T253X6002T0C101 | 400 TB | 490 MB/s | 540 MB/s |
| 8TB | T253X6008T0C101 | 2000 TB | 520 MB/s | 550 MB/s |
| 16TB | T253X6016T0C101 | 4000 TB | 520 MB/s | 550 MB/s |
Guides for this category
What owners and reviewers say
Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 14, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices
Commonly praised
- Reviewers described it as a cheap, no-frills SATA drive that comfortably outperforms a mechanical hard drive.
- It uses TLC NAND with SLC caching and is backed by a three-year warranty.
Commonly criticised
- As a SATA drive its sequential read and write speeds are capped far below NVMe drives.
- Its benchmark score sat at the lower end of the drives tested, reflecting its entry-level positioning.
Sources behind this summary
Sources
Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.