ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at the lower price as well, so it leads on both axes this page measures.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 12.67 |
| Current best price | 394,00 €betterat Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 | 513,53 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 12,31 €better | 16,05 € |
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, 2.67 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at 394,00 €, or 12,31 € per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 513,53 €, or 16,05 €. At the same 32GB, that puts ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB 119,53 € less than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB's 394,00 € sits 36% under its own 90-day median. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB's 513,53 € sits 2% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB publishes none.
Which to buy
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB leads TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, tracked at 394,00 € against 513,53 €: 119,53 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB leads TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.