Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB vs Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB
On true latency Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB comes out ahead: 15.38 ns, where Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB takes 16.25 ns. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB | KingstonValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5200 | 6400better |
| 40 | 52 | |
| True latency (ns) | 15.38better | 16.25 |
| Current best price | — | 592,41 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 18,51 € |
No tracked price for Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB vs Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB in detail
True latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 15.38 ns, against 16.25 ns for Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB — a difference of 0.86 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40; Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52.
Transfer rate
Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 5200 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 41600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB, Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB ships as 1 × 32GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB runs 40-40-40-77, and Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is the quicker at 15.38 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB faster than Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB?
- Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is, on true latency: 15.38 ns against 16.25 ns. Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40 and Kingston ValueRAM DDR5-6400 CUDIMM 1x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL52; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is the quicker at 15.38 ns of true latency.