G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency of the two at 9.33 ns, against 9.50 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is tracked at the lower price as well, so it leads on both axes this page measures.
| Specification | G.SKILLTrident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 8000better | 6000 |
| 38 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.50 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | 941,22 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-12 | 489,95 €betterat Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 29,41 € | 15,31 €better |
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB, 0.17 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 8000 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 64000 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is tracked at 941,22 €, or 29,41 € per gigabyte; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 489,95 €, or 15,31 €. At the same 32GB, that puts KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 451,27 € less than G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB. G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB's 941,22 € sits 16% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is specified at 1.45 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is 38-48-48-128, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is 28-36-36-76. On error correction: G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 gives up nothing to G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB on what is measured here: quicker on true latency at 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns, and the cheaper of the two at the prices this site has tracked.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 9.50 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB. G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28, tracked at 489,95 € against 941,22 €: 451,27 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 gives up nothing to G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB on what is measured here: quicker on true latency at 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns, and the cheaper of the two at the prices this site has tracked.