G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB
9.44 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB against 9.50 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | G.SKILLTrident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 8000better | 7200 |
| 38 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.50 | 9.44better |
| Current best price | 941,22 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-12 | — |
| Price per GB | 29,41 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 9.44 ns against 9.50 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB, 0.06 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 8000 MT/s to 7200 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB — 64000 MB/s per module against 57600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is specified at 1.45 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at 1.4 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is 38-48-48-128, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB publishes none. On error correction: G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.44 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB against 9.50 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB. G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns.