Skip to main content

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28

KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB32 GB · 5600 MT/s · 40 CL · 14.29 nsLeads on Current best price
KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL2832 GB · 6000 MT/s · 28 CL · 9.33 nsLeads on Speed
In short

On true latency KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 comes out ahead: 9.33 ns, where Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB takes 14.29 ns. The lower tracked price belongs to Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB, which leaves each kit ahead on one axis and neither ahead on both.

SpecificationKingstonFURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GBKLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)56006000better
4028
True latency (ns)14.299.33better
Current best price243,43 €betterat Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-04489,95 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13
Price per GB7,61 €better15,31 €

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail

True latency

KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 14.29 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB, 4.95 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.

Transfer rate

KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 carries the higher rating, 6000 MT/s to 5600 MT/s for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB — 48000 MB/s per module against 44800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.

Price and tracked history

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is tracked at 243,43 €, or 7,61 € per gigabyte; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 489,95 €, or 15,31 €. At the same 32GB, that puts Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB 246,52 € less than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB's 243,43 € sits 55% under its own 90-day median.

Kit layout

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.

Voltage

Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is specified at 1.25 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.

Lighting and timings

On lighting: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is 40-40-40, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is 28-36-36-76.

Which to buy

Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns against 14.29 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.

Common questions about this pair

Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 14.29 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
Which one costs less?
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB, tracked at 243,43 € against 489,95 €: 246,52 € between them at the same 32GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns against 14.29 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.
How we track prices

Related comparisons