KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB
Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 9.14 ns, against 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 | PatriotViper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 7000better |
| 28 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.33 | 9.14better |
| Current best price | 489,95 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 15,31 € | — |
No tracked price for Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 9.14 ns against 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28, 0.19 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB runs 7000 MT/s at CL32.
Transfer rate
Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 7000 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 56000 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting, and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is 28-36-36-76, and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB publishes none.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB is the quicker at 9.14 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 faster than Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.14 ns for Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB against 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28 and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB runs 7000 MT/s at CL32, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-7000 2x16GB is the quicker at 9.14 ns of true latency.