KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB
KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB32 GB · 6000 MT/s · 30 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Current best priceOn true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB comes out ahead: 9.44 ns, where KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB takes 10.00 ns. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is tracked at the lower price, so the two split the axes this page measures, one each.
| Specification | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 7200better |
| 30 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 9.44better |
| Current best price | 461,02 €betterat Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-17 | 607,04 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-25 |
| Price per GB | 14,41 €better | 18,97 € |
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 9.44 ns against 10.00 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB, 0.56 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 7200 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 57600 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is tracked at 461,02 €, or 14,41 € per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at 607,04 €, or 18,97 €. At the same 32GB, that puts KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB 146,02 € less than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB's 607,04 € sits 0% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at 1.4 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 30-36-36-76, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB publishes none.
Which to buy
Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns against 10.00 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.
Common questions about this pair
- Is KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.44 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB against 10.00 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB, tracked at 461,02 € against 607,04 €: 146,02 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 9.44 ns against 10.00 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.