Skip to main content
G.Skill

G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 Spec and Price in France

DDR52x16GBSODIMM14.29 ns true latency

G.Skill's Ripjaws line in the 262-pin laptop form factor runs the 5600 MT/s class at CL40 (40-40-40-89) with a CL46 (46-45-45-89) grade of the larger kits, both at 1.1V per the documented listings. SODIMMs are unbuffered non-ECC like their UDIMM siblings, built for DDR5 laptop and mini-PC upgrades at the mainstream speed.

Tied 2nd of 25 models in the Laptop RAM catalog on Speed — 12 models share this figure.

Current best price
From 531,77 €Price too old to confirm

Prices include VAT.

The last tracked price for the 2x16GB G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 in France was 531,77 € at Amazon.fr, captured 2026-10-07. Across one tracked merchant and 643 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 2x16GB G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 is 512,62 € and the lowest recorded price is 114,13 €. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

  • 2x16GB
  • 1x32GB
  • 1x32GB CL46
  • 2x48GB CL46
August 2, 2026120 data pointstoday · 2 216,08 €

Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
2x16GB
Memory type
DDR5
Speed
5600 MT/s
CAS latency
Form factor
SODIMM
Voltage
1.1 V
Timings
40-40-40-89
Modules
2
RGB
No

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberSpeedCAS latencyCurrent best price
2x16GBF5-5600S4040A16GX2-RS5600 MT/s40

531,77 €

Price too old to confirm

1x32GBF5-5600S4040A32GX1-RS5600 MT/s40—
1x32GB CL46F5-5600S4645A32GX1-RS5600 MT/s46

972,59 €

Price too old to confirm

2x32GB CL46F5-5600S4645A32GX2-RS5600 MT/s46—
2x48GB CL46F5-5600S4645A48GX2-RS5600 MT/s46

2 216,08 €

Price too old to confirm

2x32GB CL40F5-5600S4040A32GX2-RS5600 MT/s40—

Guides for this category

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.