Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 Spec and Price in France
Gigastone's Game Pro DDR4 line runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 (16-18-18-40) and 1.35V, per the documented listings — kits from 16GB to 64GB for mainstream DDR4 gaming builds, with a 3600 CL18 grade of the 32GB kit.
Tied 110th of 139 models in the RAM catalog on Speed — 25 models share this figure.
Prices include VAT.
The last tracked price for the 2x8GB Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 in France was 203,71 € at Amazon.fr, captured 2026-09-15. Across one tracked merchant and 53 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 2x8GB Gigastone Game Pro DDR4-3200 is 148,99 € and the lowest recorded price is 39,99 €. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.
Captured periodically and may have changed.
- 2x8GB
- 2x16GB
- 4x8GB
- 4x16GB
- 2x16GB 3600 CL18
Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices
Specifications
- Capacity
- 2x16GB
- True latency
- 10.00 ns
- Memory type
- DDR4
- Speed
- 3200 MT/s
- CAS latency
- Form factor
- UDIMM
- Voltage
- 1.35 V
- Timings
- 16-18-18-40
- Modules
- 2
- RGB
- No
Capacities
| Configuration | Part number | Speed | CAS latency | True latency | Current best price | Price per GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2x8GB | — | — | — | — | 203,71 € Price too old to confirm | 12,73 €/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 2x16GB | — | 3200 MT/s | 16 | 10.00 ns | 218,99 € Price too old to confirm | 6,84 €/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 4x8GB | — | 3200 MT/s | 16 | 10.00 ns | 241,99 € Price too old to confirm | 7,56 €/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 4x16GB | — | 3200 MT/s | 16 | 10.00 ns | 466,99 € Price too old to confirm | 7,30 €/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 2x16GB 3600 CL18 | — | 3600 MT/s | 18 | 10.00 ns | 436,99 € Price too old to confirm | 13,66 €/GB Price too old to confirm |
Guides for this category
Sources
Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.