PickyPeacock
Sign in
G.SKILL

G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 Spec and Price in France

DDR42x16GBUDIMM8.89 ns true latency

Buyers chasing low latency at DDR4-3600 land on Ripjaws V, which pairs CL16 timings (16-19-19-39) with 1.35V — a true latency edge over Corsair's Vengeance RGB PRO, which runs the same 3600 MT/s speed at CL18. No RGB here, just a mainstream DDR4 kit built around that timings-to-speed ratio. Against G.SKILL's own Aegis DDR4-3200, Ripjaws V holds the same CL16 floor but at a 400 MT/s higher clock, with secondary timings (19-19-39) just one step looser than Aegis's 18-18-38.

Tied 102nd of 139 models in the RAM catalog on Speed — 8 models share this figure.

Current best price
From 127,46 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-04 · 7,97 €/GBView at Amazon.fr

Prices include VAT.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

30D90D180DAll
  • 2x8GB
  • 2x16GB
  • 2x16GB CL18
  • 2x8GB 3000 CL16
  • 2x8GB 3600 CL18
  • 2x8GB 2400 CL15
  • 4x8GB 2666 CL19
March 19, 20261160 capturestoday · 256,22 €

Each point is one capture, not a list price. How we track prices

Among in-stock DDR4 32GB kits, nothing beats this on both price and latency.

Compare with

Specifications

Capacity
2x16GB
True latency
8.89 ns
Memory type
DDR4
Speed
3600 MT/s
CAS latency
Form factor
UDIMM
Voltage
1.35 V
Timings
16-19-19-39
Modules
2
RGB
No

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberSpeedCAS latencyTrue latencyCurrent best pricePrice per GB
2x8GBF4-3600C16D-16GVKC———
158,01 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15

9,88 €/GB
2x16GBF4-3600C16D-32GVKC3600 MT/s168.89 ns
278,02 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15

8,69 €/GB
2x16GB CL18F4-3600C18D-32GVK3600 MT/s1810.00 ns
248,11 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15

7,75 €/GB
2x8GB 3000 CL16F4-3000C16D-16GVRB3000 MT/s1610.67 ns
127,46 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-04

7,97 €/GB
2x8GB 3600 CL18F4-3600C18D-16GVK3600 MT/s1810.00 ns
145,54 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15

9,10 €/GB
2x8GB 2400 CL15F4-2400C15D-16GVS2400 MT/s1512.50 ns
158,01 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15

9,88 €/GB
4x8GB 2666 CL19F4-2666C19Q-32GVR2666 MT/s1914.25 ns
307,74 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15

9,62 €/GB

Guides for this category

How much RAM you actually needHow to size memory from the pressure your machine is under now, why running short quietly costs speed, and when a matched pair beats one stick.RAM speed and latency, and when they matterWhat a kit's MT/s and CAS latency each measure, why true latency is the two together, and the machines where the numbers actually change anything.SO-DIMM vs DIMM: the memory a laptop takesWhy laptop memory is a different module from desktop memory, how DDR4 and DDR5 are keyed apart, and why some machines take no module at all.What is ECC memory, and when you need itWhat error-correcting memory actually catches, how registered and load-reduced modules differ from unbuffered ones, and why the platform decides.

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 2 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Terrific out-of-the-box performance and very receptive to overclocking, in a wide range of colours and capacities.
  • Owners report the modules hitting their rated speeds through XMP or the AMD memory profile on a wide range of Intel and AMD boards.
  • Owners consider them inexpensive for a 32GB CL16 kit and good value.
  • The absence of RGB and the short heatspreader, which clears large CPU coolers, are recurring points of praise.
  • Owners report further overclocking headroom beyond the rated profile with manual tuning.

Commonly criticised

  • Expensive at the time, and tightening timings at the stock speed proved difficult.
  • Owners note that some motherboards do not apply the XMP profile correctly and require manual timing and voltage entry.
  • An owner reports one stick in the first kit failing, with the replacement handled smoothly by the manufacturer.

Sources behind this summary

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.