Skip to main content
Samsung

Samsung 970 EVO Plus Spec and Price in France

NVME1TBM.2 22803500 MB/s read

Released January 22, 2019

Samsung's DRAM-backed PCIe 3.0 workhorse reaches 3,500/3,300 MB/s sequential with 600K/550K random IOPS on the 1TB grade, per the datasheet rev 3.0. The Phoenix controller and a small DRAM cache keep random-write performance consistent under sustained load, which is the practical difference from the DRAM-less 980 at the same speed tier. It remains the upgrade pick for laptops and older desktops capped at PCIe 3.0 that want reliable throughput rather than the newest interface.

Tied 61st of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential read — 7 models share this figure. 59th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential write.

Current best price
From 374,07 €at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15 · 374,07 €/TBView at Amazon.fr

Prices include VAT.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

  • 1TB
  • 2TB
June 24, 202613 capturestoday · 374,07 €

Each point is one capture, not a list price. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
1TB
Interface
NVME
Sequential read
3500 MB/s
Sequential write
3300 MB/s
Random read
600000 IOPS
Random write
550000 IOPS
PCIe generation
3
Form factor
M.2 2280
NAND type
TLC
DRAM cache
Controller
Samsung Phoenix controller
Endurance (TBW)
600 TB
Warranty
5 years

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberEndurance (TBW)Sequential writeSequential readCurrent best pricePrice per TB
1TBMZ-V7S1T0B/AM600 TB3300 MB/s3500 MB/s
374,07 €

at Amazon.fr · captured 2026-09-15

374,07 €/TB
250GBMZ-V7S250BW150 TB2500 MB/s3500 MB/s
2TBMZ-V7S2T0B/AM1200 TB3300 MB/s3500 MB/s

412,20 €

Price too old to confirm

Guides for this category

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Outstanding endurance and strong performance for its segment, posting the fastest consumer database results measured at the time.
  • Strong random read and write results.

Commonly criticised

  • Not record-setting in every workload, and smaller capacities are likely to be slower.

Sources behind this summary

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.