A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) vs G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17
A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) and G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 arrive at the same true latency, 14.17 ns apiece. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | A-Tech8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) | G.SKILLAegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 2400 | 2400 |
| 17 | 17 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.17 | 14.17 |
| Current best price | — | $189.99at Newegg · captured 2026-09-04 |
| Price per GB | — | $5.94 |
No tracked price for A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) vs G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 14.17 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 2400 MT/s at CL17 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 2400 MT/s, which is 19200 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL17. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.
Kit layout
A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) ships as 1 × 32GB, G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 ships as 2 × 16GB. A real difference, and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for adding later. Which suits comes down to the board and to whether more memory is planned.
Voltage
A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) is specified at 1.2 V and G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) is published with no RGB lighting, and G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) publishes none, and G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 is 16-18-18-38. On error correction: A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) is published without ECC, and G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 14.17 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.
Common questions about this pair
- Is A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) faster than G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17?
- Neither is. Both work out at 14.17 ns of true latency — A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400 UDIMM 32GB Kit (4x8GB) runs 2400 MT/s at CL17, G.Skill Aegis DDR4-3200 2x16GB 2400 CL17 runs 2400 MT/s at CL17, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 14.17 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.