Patriot Viper Steel DDR4-3200 Spec and Price in the United States
Viper Steel's 32GB DDR4-3200 kit runs CL16 at 1.35V, a tight CAS latency for this speed grade among mainstream DDR4 parts. The plain black heatspreaders and absence of RGB target buyers upgrading an existing DDR4 build for capacity and speed rather than looks. Two 16GB modules keep it in dual-channel configuration, standard for most consumer boards.
Tied 110th of 139 models in the RAM catalog on Speed — 25 models share this figure.
Prices exclude sales tax.
The last tracked price for the 1x16GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4-3200 in the United States was $116.99 at Amazon.com, captured 2026-10-12. Across 2 tracked merchants and 279 days of recorded prices, the 90-day median for the 1x16GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4-3200 is $135.99 and the lowest recorded price is $25.99. This site began capturing prices on July 30, 2026; for Amazon listings, prices dated earlier come from Keepa's price history.
Captured periodically and may have changed.
- 2x8GB
- 2x16GB
- 2x32GB
- 1x16GB
- 1x32GB
- 2x8GB CL18 RGB
- 1x16GB CL18 RGB
- 2x16GB CL18 RGB
- 1x32GB CL18 RGB
- 2x32GB CL18 RGB
Each point is one day's recorded price, not a list price. Points dated before July 30, 2026, when this site began capturing prices, come from Keepa's Amazon price history. How we track prices
Specifications
- Capacity
- 2x16GB
- True latency
- 10.00 ns
- Memory type
- DDR4
- Speed
- 3200 MT/s
- CAS latency
- Form factor
- UDIMM
- Voltage
- 1.35 V
- Timings
- 16-20-20-40
- Modules
- 2
- RGB
- No
Capacities
| Configuration | Part number | Speed | CAS latency | True latency | Current best price | Price per GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2x8GB | PVS416G320C6K | — | — | — | $185.77 Price too old to confirm | $11.61/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 2x16GB | PVS432G320C6K | 3200 MT/s | 16 | 10.00 ns | $325.46 Price too old to confirm | $10.17/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 2x32GB | PVS464G320C6K | — | — | — | $539.99 Price too old to confirm | $8.44/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 1x16GB | PVS416G320C6 | — | — | — | $116.99 Price too old to confirm | $7.31/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 1x32GB | PVS432G320C6 | 3200 MT/s | 16 | 10.00 ns | $239.99 Price too old to confirm | $7.50/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 2x8GB CL18 RGB | PVSR416G320C8K | 3200 MT/s | 18 | 11.25 ns | $175.95 Price too old to confirm | $11.00/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 1x16GB CL18 RGB | — | 3200 MT/s | 18 | 11.25 ns | $185.61 Price too old to confirm | $11.60/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 2x16GB CL18 RGB | — | 3200 MT/s | 18 | 11.25 ns | $215.99 Price too old to confirm | $6.75/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 1x32GB CL18 RGB | — | 3200 MT/s | 18 | 11.25 ns | $239.99 Price too old to confirm | $7.50/GB Price too old to confirm |
| 2x32GB CL18 RGB | — | 3200 MT/s | 18 | 11.25 ns | $507.99 Price too old to confirm | $7.94/GB Price too old to confirm |
What owners and reviewers say
Summarised from 2 source(s), reviewed September 13, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices
Commonly praised
- Superb performance across a wide range of tests, with generous capacity that suits content creators.
- Ideal for motherboards that only have two memory slots.
- Owners consider it good value for a high-capacity DDR4 kit, with a low price per gigabyte.
- Many owners report it reaches its advertised speed with XMP enabled and works without trouble in mainstream boards.
- The heatspreaders are described as good looking and the modules easy to install.
Commonly criticised
- Very little headroom left for further performance tuning.
- Several owners say the advertised frequency and timings do not match what the XMP profile actually applies.
- Owners report little to no overclocking headroom and difficulty running two kits together or populating four DIMM slots.
- One owner reports the heatsinks were loosely attached and one came off after installation.
Sources behind this summary
- Newegg — 4 out of 5 (112 ratings), as of September 15, 2026
- Tom's Hardware — review
Guides for this category
Sources
Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.