Fanxiang

fanxiang S101Q Spec and Price in the United States

SATA1TB2.5-inch560 MB/s read

The S101Q sits in the same no-frills SATA class as most of the budget field: 560/510 MB/s sequential read/write on a 1TB 2.5-inch drive, with a three-year warranty and none of the extras — no DRAM cache spec, no PCIe headline — that pricier drives lead with. It's built for basic responsiveness gains over a mechanical drive rather than any performance ceiling, the kind of pick for a secondary desktop or an older machine getting its first SSD upgrade.

Tied 87th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential read — 8 models share this figure. 98th of 106 models in the SSD catalog on Sequential write.

Current best price
From $44.99at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-02 · $175.74/TBView at Amazon.com

Prices exclude sales tax.

Captured periodically and may have changed.

Price history

  • 256GB
  • 512GB
  • 1TB
  • 2TB
March 23, 202695 capturestoday · $219.99

Each point is one capture, not a list price. How we track prices

Specifications

Capacity
1TB
Interface
SATA
Sequential read
560 MB/s
Sequential write
510 MB/s
Form factor
2.5-inch
Warranty
3 years

Capacities

ConfigurationPart numberCurrent best pricePrice per TB
256GB
$44.99

at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-02

$175.74/TB
512GB
$69.99

at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-11

$136.70/TB
1TB
$129.99

at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-15

$129.99/TB
2TB
$229.99

at Amazon.com · captured 2026-09-15

$115.00/TB
4TB

Guides for this category

What owners and reviewers say

Summarised from 1 source(s), reviewed September 14, 2026. A source is counted only where it names this model exactly. How we track prices

Commonly praised

  • Reviewers found it a low-cost SATA drive that reaches the interface's sequential limits.
  • It carries a large pSLC cache, keeping burst performance high.

Commonly criticised

  • It uses QLC NAND, so sustained write speed drops sharply once the cache is exhausted.
  • Random and 4K performance is modest, as expected for a budget SATA drive.

Sources behind this summary

Sources

Every spec above was pulled from one of these — a field a source didn't state was left off rather than estimated.